dojN001296.xml

dojN001296.xml

born-digital

email

yes

no

2002-01-03

Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:54 PM
Sept 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001

Ishpeming, Mi

January 3, 2002

Kenneth L Zwick, Director
Office of Management Programs
Civil Division
U S Department of Justice
Main Building, Room 3140
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20530

RE: Comments on the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001

Dear Mr. Zwick:

I am a retired age 58 citizen/taxpayer and have thefollowing comments
(due January 21, 2002) concerning the December 21, 2001 final interim rule
and proposed policy stated below relating to the distribution of monies to
victims of the September 11th tragedy.

It is our view that, absent extraordinary circumstances, awards in excess of
$3 million,tax-free, will rarely be appropriate in light of individual needs
and resources.At the same time, we want to ensure that victims' families are
receiving atleast a minimum level of resources to help meet their needs and
rebuild their lives. Thus, we have concluded that the families of deceased
victims should receive a combined total of at least $500,000 from this
program, other state and federal programs, life insurance policies and other
sources ofcompensation. Similarly, the baseline for single decedents should
be $300,000.This ensures that every needy claimant's total compensation from
this program and other sources will be at least equal to these threshold
amounts.

Forthose victims who died as a result of the September 11 aircraft crashes,
the presumed noneconomic losses will be $250,000, plus an additional $50,000
for the spouse and each dependent of the deceased victim. That $250,000
figure is roughly equivalent to the amounts received under existing federal
programs by public safety officers who are killed while on duty, or members
of our militarywho are killed in the line of duty while serving our nation.
See 38U.S.C. § 1967 (military personnel); 42 U.S.C. § 3796 (Public Safety
OfficersBenefit Program). The latter figures -- $50,000 for the spouse and
each dependent -- include a noneconomic component of & quot; replacement
services loss."

Since the government is planning to step in and assume legal liability for
victim damages due to the September 11th, terrorist attack why not limit
award settlement amounts to more reasonable $ 500,000 (families) and$ 300,000
(individuals) amounts to better utilize taxpayer monies. A settlement of this
nature appears to be more than comparable to a customary Term life Insurance
benefit available to the average
U S Citizen. Also, to that of a member of our armed forces who would
receive a maximum term benefit of $ 250,000.

A maximum award for families of $ 500,000 and individuals of$ 300,000 would
appear to be more fair and equal and would not consider a victims past
employments and future earning potential. Why should any family receive an
excessive benefit of $ 3 million at taxpayers expense? An award based upon an
individuals future income potential appears excessive and arbitrary and
discriminatory in favor of current and temporary high wage individuals.

The governments liability should also be funded as much aspossible by
terrorist frozen bank account funds.

Maximum awards to Sept 11th victims not only should be reasonable and fair to
all victims but also be comparable to customary private and public awards and
benefits available to the average United States Citizen or military enlisted
men.

The Average U S Citizen would be more than happy to be covered with a Term
Life Insurance benefit of $ 500,000 or $ 300,000. Also, the customary Social
Security Death Benefit of $ 255 appears much too low in comparison.

Again, my main comment is that victim awards should be limited to a maximum
of $ 300, 000 for individuals and $ 500.000 for families in the name of
fiscal responsibility and fairness to all U S Citizens.

Government funds are considered limited and available funds can be more
prudently spent on social and health care programs benefiting needy and
uninsured U.S. Citizens. Also, the customary Social Security death benefit of
$ 255 for all citizens should be increased to at least $ 1000 to cover burial
costs for all Americans.

Thank you for your consideration of my comments.

Sincerely,

Individual Comment

2002-01-03