dojN001561.xml
Title
dojN001561.xml
Source
born-digital
Media Type
email
Date Entered
2002-01-11
September 11 Email: Body
Friday, January 11, 2002 5:56 PM
concerns over victim compensation fund
Dear Mr. Kenneth Feinberg,
I am writing to express my concerns over the victim's compensation fund. Based on the current format of the distribution of the funds myself and others will be receiving minimal or no compensation from the government. It appears the guidelines of the fund takes whatever possible measures to reduce the amount of compensation awarded to the victims' families.The fund designed to compensate the families of the victims, fails to take in an adequate account for non - economical losses. Many families of victims award's are off-set by the collateral sources reduction. If the total amount of collateral sources myself and others receive is greater than the total award for the economic losses than the award for non - economic loss which is understood to be 250,000 is deducted. This is where my great concern arises. I strongly urge you to increase the non - economic damages to 1 million for all families. This fund was designed to compensate families for economic losses as well as non -economic losses such as pain and suffering, money under the current format, I will not receive. Many families are not being compensated for pain and suffering and would rather turn to the courts to get a fair compensation for non economic losses such as the loss of the enjoyment of life. If the bill pays awards next to nothing for the families it is leaving them with no other choice than to pursue in a long drawn out case against the airlines to adequately compensate for pain and suffering, doing exactly what the bill was designed to prevent. If there was an increase in the award for non - economical losses to adequately compensate for pain and suffering it would please many families and save them a long process of litigation in the courts.
In addition I believe that it is only fair and equitable that families have the right to be fully informed of their compensation prior to officially waving their right to litigate. Anything other is unjust and beneficial to the airlines and the government.
Mr. Feinberg I truly thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. I thank your efforts and all your work pertaining to the compensation of the families of the victims. I hope you can realize the problems of the bill that limits many families of their proper reward and be able to make amendments that benefit the victims as opposed to the airlines. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks again.
Sincerely,
Individual Comment
concerns over victim compensation fund
Dear Mr. Kenneth Feinberg,
I am writing to express my concerns over the victim's compensation fund. Based on the current format of the distribution of the funds myself and others will be receiving minimal or no compensation from the government. It appears the guidelines of the fund takes whatever possible measures to reduce the amount of compensation awarded to the victims' families.The fund designed to compensate the families of the victims, fails to take in an adequate account for non - economical losses. Many families of victims award's are off-set by the collateral sources reduction. If the total amount of collateral sources myself and others receive is greater than the total award for the economic losses than the award for non - economic loss which is understood to be 250,000 is deducted. This is where my great concern arises. I strongly urge you to increase the non - economic damages to 1 million for all families. This fund was designed to compensate families for economic losses as well as non -economic losses such as pain and suffering, money under the current format, I will not receive. Many families are not being compensated for pain and suffering and would rather turn to the courts to get a fair compensation for non economic losses such as the loss of the enjoyment of life. If the bill pays awards next to nothing for the families it is leaving them with no other choice than to pursue in a long drawn out case against the airlines to adequately compensate for pain and suffering, doing exactly what the bill was designed to prevent. If there was an increase in the award for non - economical losses to adequately compensate for pain and suffering it would please many families and save them a long process of litigation in the courts.
In addition I believe that it is only fair and equitable that families have the right to be fully informed of their compensation prior to officially waving their right to litigate. Anything other is unjust and beneficial to the airlines and the government.
Mr. Feinberg I truly thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. I thank your efforts and all your work pertaining to the compensation of the families of the victims. I hope you can realize the problems of the bill that limits many families of their proper reward and be able to make amendments that benefit the victims as opposed to the airlines. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks again.
Sincerely,
Individual Comment
September 11 Email: Date
2002-01-11
Collection
Citation
“dojN001561.xml,” September 11 Digital Archive, accessed September 27, 2024, https://911digitalarchive.org/items/show/27887.