[MAPC-policy] Re: [MAPC-discuss] city resolution in jeopardy

[MAPC-policy] Re: [MAPC-discuss] city resolution in jeopardy

born-digital

email

yes

no

2001-11-06

You should contact XX and XX as well on this.  Tom is
on the
CC because of an elections screw-up and was nominated because he also
represents the same district already on the Dane Co. Board of
Supervisors.  He
might be more open since he probably won't try to run for CC for the
next
election.

Also, you don't have to have the text ready by Thursday because it can
be
introduced "By Title Only," which means only the title of the resolution
is
given at that time and you'll have until the Thursday of tthe week
before the
Nov. 20 CC meeting to work out the wording.  That's my strong
recommendation!

X

X wrote:

> Folks,
>    Initial indications are that the progressive caucus thought the milder
> form of our resolution was still too controversial for them to support.
>    I'm going to buttonhole some alders before the Common Council meeting
> tonight, find out more, and work with X on this.
>    We may need to submit the text as-is by this Thursday, and hope for at
> least a debate on 11/20, even if we can't get anyone else to support it.
>
> Peace,
> X
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss@madpeace.org mailing list
> http://lists.OpenSoftwareServices.com/mailman/listinfo/madpeace-discuss

_______________________________________________
policy@madpeace.org
http://lists.OpenSoftwareServices.com/mailman/listinfo/madpeace-policy

Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:35 PM

[MAPC-policy] Re: [MAPC-discuss] city resolution in jeopardy